There’s a scandal floating around that Jared Kushner suggested setting up a secret communication line with….

 the Russians!

The headlines sounded awful so since they broke I couldn’t even bring myself to read them. The stress of all this is too much to bear sometimes. But I coffee’d up and read the first article in the Daily Caller, then in Circa and finally, ABC News.  All of them reported that Jared Kushner suggested to  Russian Ambassador Sergei Kislyak that the Trump transition team could communicate with the Kremlin through a secret line.

They all based their entire stories on a Washington Post article. The WaPo article was based solely on “unnamed sources.”

So it’s garbage folks. More garbage from the PR arm of the Democratic American Globalist Party.

After close to a year of illegal surveillance and a blatant abuse of our Congressional resources, the Democratic American Globalist Party has still not found one drop of evidence that suggests that President Trump or his campaign colluded with Russia to effect the outcome of the election.

They’ve got nothing, so now they’re going after President Trump’s son-in-law. Kushner has already stated that he’d be happy to answer any questions before the Senate Intelligence Committee.

But wait-check this out….

From The Daily Caller,

“The Post reports, citing U.S. officials who were briefed on intelligence gathered from intercepted Russian communications.”

Hmmm. “Intercepted Russian communications.”

From Circa,

“Ambassador Sergei Kislyak told his superiors in Moscow that Kushner made the proposal during a meeting on December 1 or 2 at Trump Tower, according to intercepts of Russian communications that were reviewed by US officials.”

Hmmm.  “Kislyak told his superiors in Moscow…” Are they saying that Obama was wiretapping the Embassy and/or Moscow headquarters? 

Salon cited an excerpt from the Wapo article,

“The Post noted, “the FBI closely monitors the communications of Russian officials in the United States, and maintains near-constant surveillance of its diplomatic facilities. The National Security Agency monitors the communications of Russian officials overseas.”

Hmmm. The Post just told the Russian government that we’re spying on them in their own country, in their own offices. Maybe in their own homes.

So if this is true, there are 3 questions:
  1.  Is this more disgusting abuse from the Obama the Peeping President? If so, why wasn’t that a headline?
  2. If true, why would the WaPo blatantly broadcast this? It would be a matter of highly classified Intel.
  3. Why would the  WaPo put Russians on high alert that “American eyes are watching” and violating them?  Of course it could be a lie. If not, it’s obviously  a huge risk to our national security. It hurts our ability to heal our relationship with them. But let’s face it. The American Globalists have been itching to start a war with Russia. This would throw a wrench into President Trump’s goal to turn them into allies.

At the end of the day it’s a little hard to believe that Jared Kushner would  just go ahead and ask Kislyak if he could make calls from the Russian Embassy. He had to know that he’d be seen going in there to hang out with his bros and use the phone.

Hillary & Co. need to read the news. They lost the 2016  election.

Yup, it just wasn’t in the bag for the  old hag.

Their career criminal candidate chose to set up a private server in her basement and thus, her very own State Department removed from public scrutiny. She chose to take nappie-naps instead of campaigning or visiting Wisconsin. She chose to avoid press conferences while Donald Trump worked tirelessly, holding multiple rallies a day.  She chose to have no platform to run on other than “I’m a woman.  More importantly, I’m an entitled woman and it’s my turn.”

The media needs to be held accountable for printing lies.

The American Globalists owned the press and their press-polls, but Candidate Trump crushed them anyway. They still own the press and their press-polls that wage war on our fairly elected President 24/7.

So far the lying media and the lying American Globalist politicians have not been held accountable for their smears and libelous slander. When they found out that President Trump hired a lawyer they did an Aha! He must be guilty of something!

As stated before at IMOwired, Bill and the other Dems suffer from premature celebration. It would be magnificent if President Trump’s lawyer would sue them all for slander, libel and harassment. The Left  quickly forgot that Melania successfully made the jerk who created a video about Baron that implied he had autism back off. As she was preparing for a lawsuit he removed the video. Frosting on the cake was that fat slob Rosie O’Donnell had to apologize to Melania for essentially being an adult-on-child  cyberbully. Melania also won 3 million bucks in a lawsuit against  The Daily Mail for printing lies that Melania was an escort.

Candidate Trump vowed that he would “open up libel laws” to make it easier to sue publications for printing “negative and horrible and false articles.”

That would be one way to end the fake news that the mainstream media peddles.

It’s time to question the “sacred” right of mainstream media to use unnamed sources as their sole source of information. 

Unless they want to back up the claims of those unnamed sources actual investigative journalism, they should be considered leads, nothing more.

An unnamed source can be literally anyone. An opponent, a traitor, a disgruntled employee, a pathological liar. Actually that pretty much sums up who the White House leakers are. Doesn’t matter what their pay scale or title is.

Some publications have dismantled their comments section.

They don’t want readers to see that there are other viewpoints, facts, and sources of information out there. However, some kept their comments section. It’s a quick way to do your civic duty to try to break down the brainwashing.

Lots of “Liberals” commenting there have obviously bought into the lies. The most perplexing is how they’ve swallowed the big bad Russia scare.  Yet those same people welcome unchecked Radical Islamic terrorists into our country.

Anyway, here’s my reply to ABC News.

“When you name your sources and cite information that doesn’t emanate from Washington Post and their unnamed sources I’ll listen. Otherwise these stories are no better than tasty gossip columns for Trump haters.

This just in! Trump fathers illegitimate bat-child! Melania furious!

BTW- I’m looking for more information about Hillary’s and Podesta’s ties to Russia. Is it in the archives section? I can’t find it anywhere.”

Don’t let them get away with these concocted rumors.

If a publication still has the huevos  to have a comments section, go in there and call them out if they’re only citing  “unnamed sources.”

To put anyone through Congressional Investigation Hell based on nothing more than shadowy figures and innuendo should be considered a criminal act.

Conversely, to refuse to investigate a political fave properly in spite of mountains of evidence should also be considered a criminal act.

Alan Dershowitz has called out this witch hunt for what it is. Stalin-esque. “Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime.”


Do you ever comment in publications? It’s best to do it within the body of the publication rather than just on facebook. Otherwise, your comments are limited to your facebook feed and will disappear quickly.  That’s why you’ll always see  “comment below!”