Facebooktwitterredditpinterest
Facebooktwitter

Debbie Wasserman-Schultz denied that the DHS or FBI tried to help the DNC after the “Russian” hacking last year.

The former DNC chair who rigged the Presidential primaries in favor of Hillary Clinton denies DHS Secretary Jeh Johnson’s sworn testimony in front of the House Intelligence committee.

The chronic liar and DNC cheater accused the DHS Secretary of lying under oath. She quickly toned it down and  stated that he was “misinformed.”

See: “Deal Breaker? DHS Was Not Allowed to Help DNC After Hacking”

The Washington Times reported her remarks.

“At no point during my tenure at the DNC did anyone from the FBI or any other government agency contact or communicate with me about Russian intrusion on the DNC network,” Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz said in a statement Wednesday.” 

…“As a member of Congress, I had the unique clearance to hear any classified briefing that would be involved in such an intrusion, and the FBI clearly should have come to me with that information. They did not.”

That’s not what chronic liar and cheater Donna Brazile had to say.

The Daily Caller reported,

“Wasserman Schultz’s statements conflict with those of former DNC vice chairwoman Donna Brazile, who admitted that federal officials had been in contact with them regarding hacking.

“I talked to the general counsel of the DNC today and he assures me that every step along the way when we were notified of these issues that we changed systems, changed procedures,” Brazile told CNN last summer. “…at no time did we ignore the warning from the FBI or any other federal officials.”

Where there’s smoke someone’s pants are on fire.
  • If the FBI and DHS did not contact the DNC about Russian intrusion on the network how did the DNC know there was a hack? How did they know to hire Crowdstrike to investigate it?
  • According to Comey’s testimony last January the FBI requested access to the servers multiple times.
  • Also in his testimony he said, “Ultimately what was agreed to is the private company [Crowdstrike] would share with us what they saw.”  How odd. Who agreed to what? Does the DNC call the shots when it comes to investigating national security and intel matters?
Russian Hacking. No biggie-till Hillary lost.

According to an article from The Hill, neither one of the nation’s preeminent Intel and National Security agencies were terribly interested in finding out who “hacked” into the DNC.

“The DNC had several meetings with representatives of the FBI’s Cyber Division and its Washington (D.C.) Field Office, the Department of Justice’s National Security Division, and U.S. Attorney’s Offices, and it responded to a variety of requests for cooperation, but the FBI never requested access to the DNC’s computer servers,” DNC deputy communications director Eric Walker told BuzzFeed in an email.According to one intelligence official who spoke to the publication, no U.S. intelligence agency has performed its own forensics analysis on the hacked servers.”

A Crowdstrike  post drives home why the Obama Admin should have been more concerned.

On their site last year they posted,

“June 15, 2016 UPDATE:

CrowdStrike stands fully by its analysis and findings identifying two separate Russian intelligence-affiliated adversaries present in the DNC network in May 2016. On June 15, 2016 a blog post to a WordPress site authored by an individual using the moniker Guccifer 2.0 claimed credit for breaching the Democratic National Committee. This blog post presents documents alleged to have originated from the DNC.

Whether or not this posting is part of a Russian Intelligence disinformation campaign, we are exploring the documents’ authenticity and origin. Regardless, these claims do nothing to lessen our findings relating to the Russian government’s involvement, portions of which we have documented for the public and the greater security community.”

The Crowdstrike claim was that the ” Russian hackers” were some bad actors that they were all too familiar with. The hackers go by the name Fancy Bear and Cozy Bear. They went on to list a host of prior intrusions into government systems.

SO let’s get this straight.

There has been a massive history of these Russian hackers breaching our government systems. According to the Crowdstrike report they were trying to interfere with the 2016 elections as early as May. Yet the Obama Administration, his Comey-run FBI, the DHS and Hillary Clinton (who of course was in the loop) did not feel at all alarmed. Even though it could have interfered with our country’s election. Even though it could have prevented her from being elected as President. Even though Putin actually wanted to fix it for Donald Trump.   Huh.

What we’re all thinking.

There must be records from the DHS or the FBI regarding attempts to  inform and/or help the DNC.

The Russians didn’t hack anything. At least nothing out of the ordinary.

The Russian/Collusion hoax  was concocted to cover up the  crimes of the DNC and their career criminal candidate.

Seth Rich leaked all those documents to Wikileaks and he was killed because of it.

What other inconsistencies do you see? Comment below!

If you appreciate what you’ve read, sign up on the home page for the newsletter. If you can, please join me in this fight. Support this work on Patreon. Pledges start for as little as $1.00/ month. Thank you!

Special thanks to reader Ellie Lockwood for the heads up on The Washington Times article:)

Sources

The Washington Times

The Hill

Crowdstrike 

CBS News

Facebooktwitterredditpinterest
Facebooktwitter